<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh for fuck&#8217;s sake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kablammo.strongerthandeath.com/2005/10/06/oh-for-fucks-sake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kablammo.strongerthandeath.com/2005/10/06/oh-for-fucks-sake/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Laurel</title>
		<link>http://kablammo.strongerthandeath.com/2005/10/06/oh-for-fucks-sake/comment-page-1/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kablammo.strongerthandeath.com/?p=420#comment-627</guid>
		<description>Well, I can see why he would prefer the term "Islamo-fascism" to "authoritarian theocracy":
1. Easier words to say, also with nifty hyphen
2. Wouldn't want to piss off the Saudis
3. Hey, we have no problem with authoritarian theocracy

Also, it seems like we're getting an awful lot of "X but not Y" rhetoric this week. “A set of beliefs that are evil but not insane," "a threat that was specific but not credible," etc. Do they have some sort of Pocket Field Guide to Terrorism checklists they're working from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I can see why he would prefer the term &#8220;Islamo-fascism&#8221; to &#8220;authoritarian theocracy&#8221;:<br />
1. Easier words to say, also with nifty hyphen<br />
2. Wouldn&#8217;t want to piss off the Saudis<br />
3. Hey, we have no problem with authoritarian theocracy</p>
<p>Also, it seems like we&#8217;re getting an awful lot of &#8220;X but not Y&#8221; rhetoric this week. “A set of beliefs that are evil but not insane,&#8221; &#8220;a threat that was specific but not credible,&#8221; etc. Do they have some sort of Pocket Field Guide to Terrorism checklists they&#8217;re working from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
